We help you give and we strengthen the causes you give to

Generosity is our cause

Submenu title


globe with church and checklist

Overseas ministries, governance and the Charity Commission

Photo of Stephen Mathews Stephen Mathews
3 min

In July 2023, the Charity Commission launched inquiries into The Telz Talmudical Academy and Talmud Torah Trust and The Gevurath Ari Torah Academy Trust. The regulator’s concerns related to financial management and controls within the charities, including the use of signed blank cheques. Whilst this inquiry is about charities which raise funds for Jewish faith institutes in Israel, it echoes concerns that the Commission reported on in 2022 on Christian churches and ministries.

In this recent case, the regulator was concerned about the charities’ financial management after discovering that one trustee, who lives in Israel, was in possession of the charities’ cheque books containing several blank cheques, pre-signed by the trustees who live in the UK.  Also that the charities operate heavily in cash (which the Commission advises against) and did not maintain adequate records on its use. The trustees could not provide adequate evidence on how they were monitoring or verifying the end use of the charities’ funds overseas.

The Commission then exercised its powers under the Charities Act 2011 and made an order to restrict the trustees from undertaking certain transactions, especially withdrawing funds in cash and pre-signing cheques.

This is an important reminder for all charities working or giving overseas, that they need to take extra care to ensure, and document, that the money is used properly at the far end. The cost of not doing this can be very significant.

It is also a reminder that ‘cash’ is rarely a good mechanism for payment. In the words of one regulator, “No decent organisation uses cash a lot”. If it is thought to be the right way to operate, the Trustees should document why that is, together with risk assessments of how to protect against its obvious dangers.

The governance weaknesses in these inquiries were similar to those the Commission reported on in 2022 in respect of two London-based churches.  In those cases, the Commission commented on the following:

  1. Lack of Trustee involvement (time, thought, initiative, challenge), which led on to:
  2. Little evidence that financial controls were being seriously designed and applied, which led on to:
  3. Lack of culture of responsibility or challenge in governance, which led on to:
  4. The dominance in all decisions (financial or otherwise) by a small group of leaders, which led on to:
  5. Senior leaders with little or no financial accountability, and
  6. Suspicion that funds were used for personal and not charitable aims: ‘public’ finance was run like that of a private family.

In both churches, the impact of these weaknesses was not just the negative comments from the regulators, but significant reputational damage in the church and also in the wider community and, ultimately in the case of one of them, ending in bankruptcy because of the tax impact of their uncontrolled expenditure.

For more on these issues you can read the following briefing papers and blogs on our website






Also key regulators guidance:

Charity Commission




HMRC – in relation to making payments overseas (see section 9)




Quarterly emails for trustees, treasurers and Church and Charity Leaders. Practical tools, technical resources and expert guidance to safeguard your mission and ministry. 

Profile image of Stephen Mathews
Written by

Stephen Mathews

Stephen has been at Stewardship for 15 years, advising churches and Christian charities on a breadth of issues around money, culture and governance. Previous to that, he gained valuable experience working for 20 years in the accountancy profession, alongside church leadership in his spare time.

Stephen is passionate about Local Church, UK Poverty & Debt, and International Aid, with a particular focus on educational development in Africa and in youth violence and racial inequality.